El Paso Municipal Code: Title 7 Proposed Changes (Pet Limit)

El Paso Title 7 Proposed Changes

Environmental Services has proposed some changes to Title 7 of the El Paso Municipal Code, the section of the local laws that oversee pets and animals in the city. One of the proposals is to place a LIMIT on the number of pets in a household to FOUR.

El Paso strongly is opposed to this proposed change and we have created our position with an alternative proposal in our petition. If you agree with our position we ask you as a member of our community to join us by signing our petition below.

PETITION:

This petition is to address this community’s position AGAINST the proposed limit on pets for each household to be added to Title 7.
On Thursday, April 30, 2015 Environmental Services of El Paso made a presentation at 7968 San Paulo at 5:30 PM. The proposed changes to Title 7 included placing a limit of FOUR pets (dogs/cats, in any combination) on pet owners. The limit proposal’s intent, according to city administrators, is to reduce nuisance complaints by the public and reduce response time to higher priority calls, according to Environmental Services.

We, as a community, feel that this proposed limit is overreaching without merit as Environmental Services provided no qualitative nor quantitative data to connect any public health or nuisance violations with the fact that a home has multiple pets of five or more by itself without other variables.

We understand that it is important that residents of a community have their right to live in peace but is unfair and unethical for a government to place a limit on pets in a home if they are being properly cared for and not creating a noise issue. Enforcing nuisance violations should be the responsibility of the city regardless of the number of pets in a home. Environmental Services states that one reason for delayed response times between calls is due to many officers responding to low priority barking calls. We strongly feel that setting a limit on pets will only create more calls and tie up more officers responding to these calls when there hasn’t been an instance of nuisance violations in the first place.


A PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE:

EDUCATION

I, Charlie Moreno, CPDT-KA, as a certified dog trainer, dog behavior consultant, animal advocate, rescuer, and responsible pet owner, feel that a better alternative to limiting the number of pets in a home would be to educate pet owners and complainants. 311 dispatchers and Animal Control Officers can provide helpful information on how to reduce the barking between themselves to reduce the amount of time spent by the city on these calls so they can focus more on animal cruelty, neglect, and true quality of life issues of our animals. Directing the callers to a page on the city’s website that provides resources for the complainant as well a printable materials that can be left anonymously at the pet owner’s home to allow the pet owner to correct the problem without taking up officer’s time and freeing up resources for higher priority calls.

For example:
Sophia A. Yin, DVM, MS, a world renowned author and Certified Applied Animal Behaviorist, and Sarah L. Richardson, PhD completed a study for U.C. Davis at Berkeley, California regarding “nuisance barking” in 2004 and it revealed very important information from a scientific standpoint.
The study’s introduction leaves a very important fact:

Between 25 and 30 percent of dogs relinquished to shelters are relinquished due to behavior problems (Salman 1998; Wells & Hepper 2000).

Adding a limit to the number of pets a home does not address the underlying issue of what is causing the problem behavior.
The conclusion of the study suggests that:

because a majority of excessive barking occurs when the owner is home and thus available to reinforce alternate behaviors, because many excessive barkers bark at specific stimuli rather than out of non-specific boredom, and because remote punishment has low long-term efficacy, solutions to excessive barking should focus on helping owners understand the causes of barking and providing them with positive reinforcement shaping procedures that address the specific etiologies” (Yin, 2004).

I hope that government agencies can see how important this is to our community if we want to lead a more positive and progressive community.

REFERENCES:
Wells DL, Hepper PG. Prevalence of behaviour problems reported by owners of dogs purchased from an animal rescue shelter. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2000;69:55-65.
Yin S. A remote-controlled positive reinforcement solution to excessive barking in dogs. Animal Behavior Society 2004.

AGAINST El Paso's Title 7 Proposal: Limit of 4 Pets To Each Household

  

[your signature]

398 signatures

Share this with your friends:

   


Latest Signatures
398 Yvette D. Mar 08, 2017
397 Stacey R. Sep 23, 2016
396 Joanna E. Dec 03, 2015
395 Carla R. Sep 27, 2015
394 Mary G. Aug 24, 2015
393 Christopher H. Aug 24, 2015
392 Rick G. Aug 24, 2015
391 Larry A. Aug 23, 2015
390 Alfred L. Aug 23, 2015
389 Arin D. Aug 23, 2015
388 Jessica C. Aug 23, 2015
387 Nehemias N. Aug 23, 2015
386 Denise p. Aug 23, 2015
385 Erin A. Aug 23, 2015
384 Harry K. Aug 23, 2015
383 Bryan M. Aug 23, 2015
382 Ariel B. Aug 23, 2015
381 Timothy C. Aug 22, 2015
380 Daniela G. Aug 22, 2015
379 Julia G. Aug 22, 2015
378 Cody V. Aug 19, 2015
377 rebecca d. Aug 02, 2015
376 Rodney K. Jul 31, 2015
375 Ivan G. May 14, 2015
374 Holger V. May 14, 2015
373 patrecia m. May 14, 2015
372 Michael A. May 14, 2015
371 Katie R. May 13, 2015
370 Ulysses T. May 13, 2015
369 Michelle Z. May 13, 2015
368 Stephanie G. May 13, 2015
367 Arlyse T. May 13, 2015
366 Ronica D. May 13, 2015
365 Audrei R. May 12, 2015
364 julie m. May 12, 2015
363 angelica b. May 12, 2015
362 Donna R. May 12, 2015
361 Roxanne T. May 12, 2015
360 tierra h. May 12, 2015
359 Lorraine A. May 12, 2015
358 Hugo G. May 12, 2015
357 Sarah a. May 12, 2015
356 maria o. May 12, 2015
355 luz l. May 12, 2015
354 yonathan g. May 12, 2015
353 Celeste P. May 12, 2015
352 carmen G. May 12, 2015
351 Dolores I. May 12, 2015
350 Margarita C. May 12, 2015
349 Ruby G. May 12, 2015

Comments

comments

One Comment

  1. chara says:

    I think there should be limit we have a neighbor with 12 large dogs. The bark and carry day after day forget sleep the barking is ridiculous the man is always yelling with this many dogs the flies and smell from his house is aweful. You can’t op em your windows for a fresh breeze because they stink. My children have hard time napping because those dogs don’t quite. So try buying a house that you spend your life paying for to live next to that. It’s gross and there isn’t enough space for them those dogs need a farm to run on. Foster care of children you need to have a set amount of space per child and these dogs are larger then little kids and they are all cramped into a small space live on my street you would change your mind